Cedric Stanke vs Nicholas Campbell Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 18 Nov at 09:59 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Stanke vs N. Campbell

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CYP
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Stanke 1 - 0 Campbell
They have played 3 sets in total, with Cedric Stanke winning 2 and Nicholas Campbell winning 1. The last match between Cedric Stanke and Nicholas Campbell was at the M15 Sharm ElSheikh, 18-11-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Cedric Stanke getting the victory 6-7(2) 7-6(5) 10-8.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Stanke | 1 |
| Campbell | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) M15 Sharm ElSheikh(11-18-25)
C. Stanke vs N. Campbell H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 49.50% (100-102) | Career Total W/L | 50.79% (32-31) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Stanke vs N. Campbell Match Preview:
- Recent form highlights that Nicholas Campbell has a better second serve performance, winning 43.75% of points compared to Cedric Stanke's 39.43%.
- Cedric Stanke excels in return games, capturing 45.27% of points on the opponent's second serve, whereas Campbell only manages 18.18%.
- When facing breakpoints, Stanke shows more resilience with a 62.90% save rate versus Campbell's 37.50%.
- Looking at overall match victories in the past year, both players are almost evenly matched, with Stanke at 54.55% and Campbell at 53.33%.
- Surface preferences differ: Stanke is more effective on Hard courts with a 57% win rate, whereas Campbell fares best on Clay with the same percentage.
- Both players have been active primarily in the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K circuit over the past year, with similar winning percentages.
- Stanke has a history of tackling higher-ranked opponents, averaging a 43.73 rank, unlike Campbell who averages against a 118.6 rank.
- In tight matches that go to deciding sets, neither player shows a significant edge, each winning 25% of such sets in the last year.
- Campbell surpasses Stanke in break point conversions, achieving a 66.67% rate compared to Stanke's 39.29%.
Editorial Prediction (November 18, 2025, UTC):
As the upcoming match approaches, both players bring distinct strengths and weaknesses to the court. Cedric Stanke's ability to return second serves presents a crucial advantage, potentially disrupting Nicholas Campbell’s rhythm.
While Campbell demonstrates stronger performance on break point conversion and second serve statistics, his past opponents' lower skill level might offer a skewed perspective. On the other hand, Stanke’s ability to face higher-ranked competitors could translate into a tenacious on-court presence.
Given these aspects, Stanke’s superior breakpoint save rate and adaptability against tougher opponents may prove decisive. Despite Campbell’s strengths, Cedric Stanke seems better poised for victory in this confrontation.
Cedric Stanke vs Nicholas Campbell Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Stanke vs N. Campbell H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 23 | Games Won | 21 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2:19:29 | Average Match Time | 2:19:29 |
| 100% (106/106) | 1st Serve % | 96% (80/83) |
| 62% (66/106) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (56/80) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 33% (1/3) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
| 30% (25/83) | Return Points Win % | 38% (40/106) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Stanke Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | L | 6-3 6-7(3) 10-8 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-7(2) 7-6(5) 10-8 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
N. Campbell Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-7(2) 7-6(5) 10-8 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q3 | W | 5-7 7-6(3) 10-3 | ||

C. Stanke vs N. Campbell Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49.50% (100/102) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.79% (32/31) |
| 49.45% (224/229) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.74% (69/67) |
| 49.70% (2251/2278) | Games Win/Loss | 51.09% (678/649) |
| 56.70% (55/42) | Hard Win/Loss | 48.39% (15/16) |
| 43.14% (44/58) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.13% (17/15) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 252 | Aces Total | 8 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 |
| 213 | Total Double Faults | 51 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 152.72 | Average Opponent Rank | 130.24 |
| 63% (3236/5100) | 1st Serve % | 68% (858/1269) |
| 65% (2115/3236) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (492/858) |
| 47% (867/1864) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (203/411) |
| 44% (180/413) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (44/100) |
| 38% (1899/4985) | Return Points Win % | 38% (477/1263) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 49.50% (100/102) | Futures W/L | 51.61% (32/30) |
| 49% (99/201) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (32/63) |
| 50% (19/38) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (9/18) |
| 50% (25/50) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (5/10) |
| 87% (102/89) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 94% (32/30) |
| 13% (102/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 6% (32/2) |
| 11% (100/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (31/2) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Mayar Sherif vs Eva Vedder Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 26th November 2025 Best Bets

Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Elena Malygina Prediction – WTA W75 Trnava – 26th November 2025 Best Bets

James Duckworth vs Karan Singh Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 26th November 2025 Best Bets

Luisina Giovannini vs Leolia Jeanjean Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 25th November 2025 Best Bets

Luisina Giovannini vs Leolia Jeanjean Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 25th November 2025 Best Bets
